Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 11:19:32 GMT 1
I only want to see East Frisian recipe to see how wrong it is. I bet his recipe co0ntains only 11 ingredients with b/w counting as 2. To determine whether my formulation is right or wrong, not only do you need my recipe, but most importantly, you need the actual OR. Since you are lacking both, I am afraid that neither you, the Ozzy Pothead, nor the Canadian Charlatan will be able to make such judgement in the real world. You both, the king and the prince of contradiction, do not understand the basic principles of logic. You are delusional and stupid to say the least. You two forum grave diggers should fight the last fight against each other now. This is how this epic quest is supposed to end, in an apocalyptic battle of the forces of chaos and destruction. I am no longer participating. You don't have to worry about me anymore. Gladly, there is a forum where a small yet great circle of people can exchange without any KFC thugs. I don't need this BS here. All the best to everyone else. We had good times here. It's finally over now. |
|
flg
Souschef
Posts: 1,578
|
Post by flg on Mar 18, 2024 13:24:23 GMT 1
Not proof but here is the article from Mississauga Canada interview. Link is via the Mississauga Library
If the link doesn't work I screen captured the spot in the article.
Hand written on the article is it came from the " Peel Blog" Aug 8, 1973
 |
|
|
|
Post by Silver on Mar 18, 2024 13:58:05 GMT 1
Not proof but here is the article from Mississauga Canada interview. Link is via the Mississauga Library
If the link doesn't work I screen captured the spot in the article.
Hand written on the article is it came from the " Peel Blog" Aug 8, 1973
Yep, that's what I read! Thanks flg |
|
|
|
Post by deepfriednew101 on Mar 18, 2024 15:02:06 GMT 1
Hey Willie read your OLD POST when you tried some of YOUR own Chili seasoning YOU said it amp up the Chicken and made it like KFC So looking to OLD 1930 Chili Seasoning Which were Mexican which has been commented before  |
|
smallgree
Chef
Here is a vial recipe:
Posts: 1,418
|
Post by smallgree on Mar 18, 2024 19:42:29 GMT 1
Thanks. That's the kind of info I'm looking for. CHS threw the recipe together in 1 to 2 days, which means he started with pre-mixes and broke them down to make his own version. This is what I had faith in that CHS did, and have done the same myself. I never believed that CHS spent years and years mixing and matching to get a certain taste. I've always maintained that he couldn't have set out to reach a conclusion unless he already had a goal in mind. Same with my chili. I had a taste in mind (The Original Chili Bowl, and Ray's) and worked until I developed my own version which was just as good. Only Ray's is available in powder form today.
|
|
|
|
Post by deepfriednew101 on Mar 18, 2024 19:55:20 GMT 1
Willie
Let's Get Real so people understand YOUR one of the FEW who Know what the OLD 1970's chicken taste like.
You Have Had some of the OLDER bags of seasoning FOR 2 decade.
I asked you in Private for a Answer PLEASE answer the question in PRIVATE
|
|
cman
Kitchen Assistent
Posts: 205
|
Post by cman on Mar 18, 2024 21:27:37 GMT 1
Smallgree, the problem that I see here is verification especially in the light that you, yourself maintained that CHS’s character was not pristine. So, how can you trust what he said in an interview or in a hand written recipe. Of course, it’s one just more bit of clue.
I would agree that to cater to a group, he already had a pre-mixed spices and herbs on hand. But it’s adding another ingredient could be a single spice or as you put it,” multiples”.
One more bit of info that needs to be addressed is if the rationing early on in the 40s could also have determined the spices that make up the 11 h & s.
So, it goes back to testing a recipe or an idea. Unfortunately, the test tasters are few and getting fewer. In my last taste test, one 19 y/o sampler said "it wasn't KFC because it's moist- KFC is dry"..
|
|
smallgree
Chef
Here is a vial recipe:
Posts: 1,418
|
Post by smallgree on Mar 18, 2024 21:52:32 GMT 1
Let me explain how a defense lawyer thinks. Prosecutors push a narrative and either obscure, or outright hide evidence that doesn't fit their narrative. Defense attorneys collect all evidence they can, verified or not, and try to build a truthful defense against the often biased DA narrative. We decide if the evidence is valid, or not, but it is important to have it all in front of us so that we are prepared to use whatever when we see what is thrown at us. Corroboration, one way or another comes from rebuttal evidence and witnesses. Weak evidence becomes relevant if corroborated by rebuttal. I've won jury trials with the simple slip of the lip, because I had "all of" the information out there in my trial notebook.
So if CHS, the philanderer, is quoted as saying something, I look at other sources to see if it holds water, or leaks. If it is true, then you want it in your mind.
|
|
smallgree
Chef
Here is a vial recipe:
Posts: 1,418
|
Post by smallgree on Mar 18, 2024 21:52:52 GMT 1
|
|
cman
Kitchen Assistent
Posts: 205
|
Post by cman on Mar 18, 2024 22:33:11 GMT 1
Let me explain how a defense lawyer thinks. Prosecutors push a narrative and either obscure, or outright hide evidence that doesn't fit their narrative. Defense attorneys collect all evidence they can, verified or not, and try to build a truthful defense against the often biased DA narrative. We decide if the evidence is valid, or not, but it is important to have it all in front of us so that we are prepared to use whatever when we see what is thrown at us. Corroboration, one way or another comes from rebuttal evidence and witnesses. Weak evidence becomes relevant if corroborated by rebuttal. I've won jury trials with the simple slip of the lip, because I had "all of" the information out there in my trial notebook. So if CHS, the philanderer, is quoted as saying something, I look at other sources to see if it holds water, or leaks. If it is true, then you want it in your mind. Fair enough. Your method is one way of empirically testing a path to finding the KFC OR. Albeit, thought experiments, weak or strong corroboration, sooner would need to go to lab for verification. A weak corroboration, as you well know, could be influenced by so many factors. In our case, weak record keeping and the noise from hearsay are the biggest impediments. |
|
