|
|
Post by Chickenman on Sept 27, 2022 9:35:53 GMT 1
The napkin was authenticated I read. So now we think KFC gave the 11 ingredients to an artist to draw the napkin? This is the working theory? We have standards now? 90% of what you read here are stories and speculations, and the very thing you want to doubt is an illustration that includes items almost everyone more or less thinks are in the OR? The argument just never gets old. People have to sign non-disclosure agreements for a reason. Try to contact artists and photographers that worked for KFC. They won't even respond to you. I tried. If you really believe only 2 people in the world know the recipe, as the corp claims, you must be a hopeless romantic. They probably put some of the real ones on it like ginger etc so you believe the fake ones they mix in and get misled. No way kfc is revealing the O.R on a napkin. Putting some of the real ones on it and adding some fakes ones into the mix? yes i can definitely see them doing that. How amazing it would be if kfc actually did reveal the 11h/s on a napkin? this is fantasy. The possibility definitely shouldn't be disregarded tho |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2022 10:35:44 GMT 1
flg We have standards now? 90% of what you read here are stories and speculations, and the very thing you want to doubt is an illustration that includes items almost everyone more or less thinks are in the OR? The argument just never gets old. People have to sign non-disclosure agreements for a reason. Try to contact artists and photographers that worked for KFC. They won't even respond to you. I tried. If you really believe only 2 people in the world know the recipe, as the corp claims, you must be a hopeless romantic. They probably put some of the real ones on it like ginger etc so you believe the fake ones they mix in and get misled. No way kfc is revealing the O.R on a napkin. Putting some of the real ones on it and adding some fakes ones into the mix? yes i can definitely see them doing that. How amazing it would be if kfc actually did reveal the 11h/s on a napkin? this is fantasy. The possibility definitely shouldn't be disregarded tho How many items are there in my last graphic that you would currently disagree with? 2 or 3? And yet you still decide to rather doubt than actually consider giving it a try? Hmm. I was only trying to help. It should be obvious why some people refuse to disclose the(ir) full recipe. People would tear it apart before giving it a chance because everyone knows best and yet they still struggle to crack the recipe. Honestly not trying to be cocky, but I can only sit back and enjoy my OR chicken at this point and watch the show. I will not force my views on anyone. I have reached my goal. It is your choice  |
|
|
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 10:57:55 GMT 1
Post by Chickenman on Sept 27, 2022 10:57:55 GMT 1
They probably put some of the real ones on it like ginger etc so you believe the fake ones they mix in and get misled. No way kfc is revealing the O.R on a napkin. Putting some of the real ones on it and adding some fakes ones into the mix? yes i can definitely see them doing that. How amazing it would be if kfc actually did reveal the 11h/s on a napkin? this is fantasy. The possibility definitely shouldn't be disregarded tho How many items are there in my last graphic that you would currently disagree with? 2 or 3? And yet you still decide to rather doubt than actually consider giving it a try? Hmm. I was only trying to help. It should be obvious why some people refuse to disclose the(ir) full recipe. People would tear it apart before giving it a chance because everyone knows best and yet they still struggle to crack the recipe. Honestly not trying to be cocky, but I can only sit back and enjoy my OR chicken at this point and watch the show. I will not force my views on anyone. I have reached my goal. It is your choice What are you on about lol? i wasn't doubting anything except the napkin authenticity. Are you seriously telling me you believe kfc revealed the entire recipe on a NAPKIN?? And trust me, you have not cracked the recipe. It is so easy and lazy to just say " i have cracked it". I am so unbelievably close i felt like doing the same thing but that would only stop me from progressing even further and actually cracking it which i am on the verge of. "good enough" or "close enough" is not good enough for me, it needs to be 100% bang on. When you have cracked it you will know and so will everybody else in your house. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2022 11:07:15 GMT 1
How many items are there in my last graphic that you would currently disagree with? 2 or 3? And yet you still decide to rather doubt than actually consider giving it a try? Hmm. I was only trying to help. It should be obvious why some people refuse to disclose the(ir) full recipe. People would tear it apart before giving it a chance because everyone knows best and yet they still struggle to crack the recipe. Honestly not trying to be cocky, but I can only sit back and enjoy my OR chicken at this point and watch the show. I will not force my views on anyone. I have reached my goal. It is your choice What are you on about lol? i wasn't doubting anything except the napkin authenticity. Are you seriously telling me you believe kfc revealed the entire recipe on a NAPKIN?? And trust me, you have not cracked the recipe. It is so easy and lazy to just say " i have cracked it" I am so unbelievably close i felt like doing the same thing but that would only stop me from progressing even further and actually cracking it which i am on the verge of. "good enough" or "close enough" is not good enough for me, it needs to be 100% bang on. When you have cracked it you will know and so will everybody else in your house. It is a ridiculous statement to claim that I haven't cracked it, if you do not know my recipe or haven't tried it. You know that. You are close, well if you are, then because most ingredients you use are actually on the napkin. Aren't they? Ridiculing the napkin means ridiculing the majority of your own recipe. Think before you write. But anyway, please just disregard what I have said. Don't use the napkin ingredients. Please don't  |
|
|
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 11:15:05 GMT 1
Post by Chickenman on Sept 27, 2022 11:15:05 GMT 1
What are you on about lol? i wasn't doubting anything except the napkin authenticity. Are you seriously telling me you believe kfc revealed the entire recipe on a NAPKIN?? And trust me, you have not cracked the recipe. It is so easy and lazy to just say " i have cracked it" I am so unbelievably close i felt like doing the same thing but that would only stop me from progressing even further and actually cracking it which i am on the verge of. "good enough" or "close enough" is not good enough for me, it needs to be 100% bang on. When you have cracked it you will know and so will everybody else in your house. It is a ridiculous statement to claim that I haven't cracked it, if you do not know my recipe or haven't tried it. You know that. You are close, well if you are, then because most ingredients you use are actually on the napkin. Aren't they? Ridiculing the napkin means ridiculing the majority of your own recipe. Think before you write. But anyway, please just disregard what I have said. Don't use the napkin ingredients. Please don't I never once said they are all fake ingredients? i simply stated that some might be fake to mislead. If you want to live in fantasy land believing kfc is revealing their prized possession that they keep heavily guarded in a vault on a NAPKIN well have fun, cause ill be living over here in reality. Also, it is not a ridiculous statement to claim you haven't cracked it. Just 2 days ago you posted saying "you are studying the napkin again" but now you are telling me you have cracked the recipe? |
|
|
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 11:33:57 GMT 1
Post by Silver on Sept 27, 2022 11:33:57 GMT 1
KFC could openly tell us the original 11 ingredients, and it would still be extremely difficult to duplicate what we recollect to be KFC OR. In part (I contend) because we have no clue as to what the original OR might have actually tasted like. And because it may not have tasted anything like 1952 and beyond OR iterations. I.E., even if given the original 11 it may be impossible to duplicate our best recollections of what KFC OR tasted like.
The very earliest at which I might have tasted OR dates to 1957. That is when I believe the local (to my place of youth) franchise was launched.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 11:34:33 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2022 11:34:33 GMT 1
It is a ridiculous statement to claim that I haven't cracked it, if you do not know my recipe or haven't tried it. You know that. You are close, well if you are, then because most ingredients you use are actually on the napkin. Aren't they? Ridiculing the napkin means ridiculing the majority of your own recipe. Think before you write. But anyway, please just disregard what I have said. Don't use the napkin ingredients. Please don't I never once said they are all fake ingredients? i simply stated that some might be fake to mislead. If you want to live in fantasy land believing kfc is revealing their prized possession that they keep heavily guarded in a vault on a NAPKIN well have fun, cause ill be living over here in reality. Also, it is not a ridiculous statement to claim you haven't cracked it. Just 2 days ago you posted saying "you are studying the napkin again" but now you are telling me you have cracked the recipe? You are only making it worse. What you describe as reality is actually delusional. The delusion of an idea that KFC will not do X because you say so that is keeping you away from trying a set of ingredients. That is, with all respect, rather foolish. Also, you are misquoting me. I said I was "working" on the napkin again. To be more precise, that meant putting the graphic together on GIMP for everyone here. Not very much appreciated I see, lesson learnt. By changing the wording to "studying" though you want to imply I was unsure about it and only found out now. Again, think, research or ask before you write nonsense. It ain't that hard. Anyway, I apologise again. The last thing I wanted was this. I will stay back and stop wasting your time. Good luck and fingers crossed. |
|
|
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 11:48:01 GMT 1
Post by Chickenman on Sept 27, 2022 11:48:01 GMT 1
I never once said they are all fake ingredients? i simply stated that some might be fake to mislead. If you want to live in fantasy land believing kfc is revealing their prized possession that they keep heavily guarded in a vault on a NAPKIN well have fun, cause ill be living over here in reality. Also, it is not a ridiculous statement to claim you haven't cracked it. Just 2 days ago you posted saying "you are studying the napkin again" but now you are telling me you have cracked the recipe? You are only making it worse. What you describe as reality is actually delusional. The delusion of an idea that KFC will not do X because you say so that is keeping you away from trying a set of ingredients. That is, with all respect, rather foolish. Also, you are misquoting me. I said I was "working" on the napkin again. To be more precise, that meant putting the graphic together on GIMP for everyone here. Not very much appreciated I see, lesson learnt. By changing the wording to "studying" though you want to imply I was unsure about it and only found out now. Again, think, research or ask before you write nonsense. It ain't that hard. Anyway, I apologise again. The last thing I wanted was this. I will stay back and stop wasting your time. Good luck and fingers crossed. Lol there is no conspiracy of me changing the word "working" to "studying" to imply anything. I literally forgot how you worded it exactly and that was just a rough example of what you said. I think you are the one who needs to think and read something before you write it because once again, i never said that. Did you miss the part where i said "the possibility definitely should not be disregarded" you are literally twisting what i have said to use as fuel for some pointless argument. |
|
|
|
Post by Silver on Sept 27, 2022 11:50:19 GMT 1
Even having eaten it, there is no way in which I can actually/factually recall what 1957(ish) KFC might have tasted like. That was 65 years ago. And every iteration (change) made by corporate (whomever's hands that may have been in throughout time) has since then tainted and confused and confounded my earliest memories. That plus it isn't very likely that my senses of taste and smell are the same now as they were 65 years ago.
To imply that I would remember it simply because when experienced again it would taste like the best deep fried chicken ever is pure nonsense.
|
|
|
|
The End
Sept 27, 2022 11:56:58 GMT 1
Post by Chickenman on Sept 27, 2022 11:56:58 GMT 1
Even having eaten it, there is no way in which I can actually/factually recall what 1957(ish) KFC might have tasted like. That was 65 years ago. And every iteration (change) made by corporate (whomever's hands that may have been in throughout time) has since then tainted and confused and confounded my earliest memories. That plus it isn't very likely that my senses of taste and smell are the same now as they were 65 years ago. To imply that I would remember it simply because when experienced again it would taste like the best deep fried chicken ever is pure nonsense. Of the memory you do have of tasting it, how would you describe the overall taste? |
|
